Vehicle manufacturers tend to prefer to improve vehicle emissions by improving the engine rather than adding an additional component to treat the exhaust. However, there is a trade-off between generating CO2, NOx and particulates; often if the engine is improved to treat one type of emission then issues can arise with another type. For example, reducing CO2 and hydrocarbon emissions can lead to an increase NOx emissions. CO2 is the primary cause of climate change, which is a global issue requiring global agreement whereas air pollution is a more regional or national issue, where local and national action can have direct benefits for local inhabitants. This disconnect results in an interesting tension between efforts to tackle climate change and air pollution.
|
The concentrations of pollutants measured in the atmosphere by flying a plane over London were much larger than calculations based upon the National Emissions Inventory would suggest. There has been controversy over the role that diesel plays in generating SOA. Although levels of smaller hydrocarbons in the air are falling, the speaker argued that the (largely neglected) intermediate size (>C10) volatile organic compounds from diesel exhaust may be key to understanding the concentrations of SOAs in the atmosphere. This is becoming more important as diesel cars are now known to be the largest contributor to urban SOA formation when they make up more than 10% of cars on the road.
|
While the National Emissions Inventory shows good agreement with atmospheric measurements for molecules with few carbon atoms, those greater than C10 in size can be underestimated by a factor of 70. However, this discrepancy can be accounted for once the emission of intermediate VOCs from diesel engines is included in the models. Dr Hamilton concluded that diesel emissions contribute up to 30% of SOA in the UK. The shift to diesel in the UK has changed the balance of hydrocarbons in the atmosphere, but this shift has been unnoticed due to a lack of measurement infrastructure. However, new research is now highlighting the importance of pollutants other than CO2 and NO2 from diesel emissions.
|
In the 1980s, concerns rose about lead in petrol, leading to the development of the three way catalytic converter. The Thatcher government played a key role in developing UK environmental policy, which was first published in the ‘This Common Inheritance’ report in 1990 and discussed unleaded petrol, carbon dioxide and ozone. Even in 1990/1991, there was knowledge and awareness of the health effects of diesel emitted particles (the 1992 issue mentioned that small particles from diesel fuel may contribute to cancer). But it was not until 2012 that the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified diesel fuel as carcinogenic. During the early 1990s, a focus on fuel efficiency and hence lower CO2 emissions meant that diesel was nevertheless prioritised. Since then, all successive governments have promoted diesel to act on climate change concerns.
|
The immune response to particulates in our lungs damages the tissues and causes long term impacts. Macrophages engulf black carbon particles (from diesel exhaust) in the lungs, and try to destroy them as they would a bacterial invader by producing free radicals. As there is no bacterium to absorb the free radicals, they end up killing the macrophages and causing small levels of cellular damage. Moreover, particles contain metals and organic compounds, so also cause complex chemical reactions at the lung surface. Damage accumulates over time and can lead to disease such as chronic exposure disease, but the response to air pollution varies widely between subjects. This variation is typical of human exposure studies, and an important aspect of this research is to understand which factors affect this variation and why.
|
programme__into_the_engine.pdf | |
File Size: | 1002 kb |
File Type: |